Archive for the 'morality and gambling' Category

Everybody is doing it so it’s OK?

Doc over in Doc’s Political Parlor made a common sense point about legislatures liberalizing gambling.

Does the ‘everybody else is doing it’ argument strike you as the oddest argument in favor of expanding legalized gambling? That sure didn’t work with our mommas when we were growing up.

He continues

We should do it because our neighbors are doing it? You know what mom would say about that, ‘If everybody jumped off of a cliff, would you want to do it too?’

This simple piece of common sense blows holes through much of what the UK Government is doing to liberalize gambling at the moment.

The UK Government’s view appears to be that lots of people want to gamble, and it’s happening everywhere, therefore the UK people should get a piece of the action through taxes which is (sort off) fair enough.

However, actively promoting gambling through the Gambling Act 2005 is quite another thing. The direct consequence of their actions is that more people will end up gambling and that will hurt more people which is obviously a bad thing.

In effect, the UK Government have said that lots of people are gambling therefore it should be encouraged.

Cyber bullying is in the news today in the UK where teachers are being humiliated by pupils while their friends take mobile phone pictures of them which are then put on the Internet. Lots of youngsters seem to think these images of skirt lifting and trouser pulling down are great.

No doubt measures will be taken to try to put an end to these unpleasant, if popular, activities. So why shouldn’t we be making at least the same amount of effort with gambling?

Perhaps it all comes down to the confused state of morality these days.

The problem is that deity based religions are no longer convincing for many, yet little effort seems to have been made by Governments to identify alternative morality structures to which people can turn for guidance on their actions.

Laws of the land may provide a frame of reference for the ordinary man but where is the frame of reference for the legislaters?

Many would regard the morality of Governmental promotion of gambling as being highly questionable.

Sources of morality is the hot topic that needs to be addressed but, unfortunately, it is being avoided.

Like the ’causes of crime’ it is a problem that won’t go away.

Bye for now

Rob

(Rob Hopcott – online author and firm believer morality can exist outside religion, if we only look.)

Feeling uncomfortable about the morality of gambling but wondering why?

It seems to me that a lot of people feel uncomfortable with gambling but aren’t really sure why.

Interestingly, the petitions against gambling on the Prime Minister’s 10 Downing Street site have garnered only a small number of signatures.

(Of course, this may reflect the lack of publicity skills of those organising the petitions rather than people’s lack of belief in the cause.)

When questioned about gambling, many say that they would feel at ease with participating in a small lottery or raffle but wouldn’t go into a casino.

When pressed as to why, they usually have difficulty in explaining themselves.

Perhaps the Gambling Act 2005 has now prompted many of us to look more closely into where our personal morality comes from in the modern age.

Like myself, many people in the UK seeem no longer comfortable with religious belief, and perhaps we need to understand ‘good’ or ‘evil’ from a different starting point. Otherwise, how do we make a judgement about activities which make us feel uncomfortable of which, probably, gambling is only one?

Most people would agree that gambling ‘hurts’ some people at least. But so do cigarettes, cars and food.

Many people say that it is ’stupid’ for anybody to gamble. They point out that the odds are always loaded against the punter who will almost certainly lose in the end. So, should we encourage people to do something that is ’stupid’?

Perhaps it is also a matter of where the hurt stops. Is the hurt limited to those who become ‘problem’ gamblers. Or is it limited to the families and children of ‘problem gamblers’ who suffer from the consequences of anothers actions? Or maybe everybody who gambles is hurt a little bit.

One might also ask whether it is even actually ‘bad’ to hurt people – after all a small percentage of the population rather appear to like it?

Certainly, it is easier to ask these questions than answer them but, surely, answer them we must, if we are to make our country and world a better place.

Perhaps the greatest danger we must guard against is exemplified in popular UK TV humour.

‘Awe … yer makin my ‘ead ‘urt … am ah bovvered!’

Yet how many of us ‘thinkers’ would actually say the same, but using rather posher words?

Bye for now

Rob

(Rob Hopcott – online author and openly committed to ‘being bovvered’